Knowledge and adherence to the national guidelines for malaria case management in pregnancy among healthcare providers and drug outlet dispensers in rural, western Kenya
View/ Open
Publication Date
2016Author
Christina Riley, Stephanie Dellicour, Peter Ouma, Urbanus Kioko, Feiko O ter Kuile, Ahmeddin Omar, Simon Kariuki, Ann M Buff, Meghna Desai, Julie Gutman
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract/ Overview
Background
Although prompt, effective treatment is a cornerstone of malaria control, information on provider adherence to malaria in pregnancy (MIP) treatment guidelines is limited. Incorrect or
sub-optimal treatment can adversely affect the mother and fetus. This study assessed provider knowledge of and adherence to national case management guidelines for uncomplicated MIP.
Methods
We conducted a cross-sectional study from September to November 2013, in 51 health
facilities (HF) and a randomly-selected sample of 39 drug outlets (DO) in the KEMRI/CDC
Health and Demographic Surveillance System area in western Kenya. Provider knowledge
of national treatment guidelines was assessed with standardized questionnaires. Correct
practice required adequate diagnosis, pregnancy assessment, and treatment with correct
drug and dosage. In HF, we conducted exit interviews in all women of childbearing age
assessed for fever. In DO, simulated clients posing as first trimester pregnant women or as
relatives of third trimester pregnant women collected standardized information.
Results
Correct MIP case management knowledge and practice were observed in 45% and 31% of
HF and 0% and 3% of DO encounters, respectively. The correct drug and dosage forpregnancy trimester was prescribed in 62% of HF and 42% of DO encounters; correct prescription occurred less often in first than in second/ third trimesters (HF: 24% vs. 65%,
p<0.01; DO: 0% vs. 40%, p<0.01). Sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, which is not recommended
for malaria treatment, was prescribed in 3% of HF and 18% of DO encounters. Exposure to
artemether-lumefantrine in first trimester, which is contraindicated, occurred in 29% and
49% of HF and DO encounters, respectively.
Conclusion
This study highlights knowledge inadequacies and incorrect prescribing practices in the
treatment of MIP. Particularly concerning is the prescription of contraindicated medications
in the first trimester. These issues should be addressed through comprehensive trainings
and increased supportive supervision. Additional innovative means to improve care should
be explored
Collections
- Internal Medicine [57]