• Login
    • Login
    Advanced Search
    View Item 
    •   Maseno IR Home
    • Journal Articles
    • School of Public health & Community Development
    • Department of Nutrition and Health
    • View Item
    •   Maseno IR Home
    • Journal Articles
    • School of Public health & Community Development
    • Department of Nutrition and Health
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Measuring health system resilience in a highly fragile nation during protracted conflict: South Sudan 2011–15

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    czz160.pdf (375.2Kb)
    czz160.pdf (375.2Kb)
    Publication Date
    2020
    Author
    Jackline Odhiambo1 , Caroline Jeffery1 , Richard Lako2 , Baburam Devkota1 and Joseph J Valadez 1
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract/Overview
    Health systems resilience (HSR) is defined as the ability of a health system to continue providing normal services in response to a crisis, making it a critical concept for analysis of health systems in fragile and conflict-affected settings (FCAS). However, no consensus for this definition exists and even less about how to measure HSR. We examine three current HSR definitions (maintaining function, improving function and achieving health system targets) using real-time data from South Sudan to develop a data-driven understanding of resilience. We used 14 maternal, newborn and child health (MNCH) coverage indicators from household surveys in South Sudan collected at independence (2011) and following 2 years of protracted conflict (2015), to construct a resilience index (RI) for 9 of the former 10 states and nationally. We also assessed health system stress using conflict-related indicators and developed a stress index. We cross tabulated the two indices to assess the relationship of resilience and stress. For maintaining function for 80% of MNCH indicators, seven state health systems were resilient, compared with improving function for 50% of the indicators (two states were resilient). Achieving the health system national target of 50% coverage in half of the MNCH indicators displayed no resilience. MNCH coverage levels were low, with state averages ranging between 15% and 44%. Central Equatoria State displayed high resilience and high system stress. Lakes and Northern Bahr el Ghazal displayed high resilience and low stress. Jonglei and Upper Nile States had low resilience and high stress. This study is the first to investigate HSR definitions using a resilience metric and to simultaneously measure health system stress in FCAS. Improving function is the HSR definition detecting the greatest variation in the RI. HSR and health system stress are not consistently negatively associated. HSR is highly complex warranting more in-depth analyses in FCAS.
    Permalink
    https://repository.maseno.ac.ke/handle/123456789/4172
    Collections
    • Department of Nutrition and Health [81]

    Maseno University. All rights reserved | Copyright © 2022 
    Contact Us | Send Feedback

     

     

    Browse

    All of Maseno IRCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Maseno University. All rights reserved | Copyright © 2022 
    Contact Us | Send Feedback