• Login
    • Login
    Advanced Search
    View Item 
    •   Maseno IR Home
    • Journal Articles
    • School of Medicine
    • Department of Pathology
    • View Item
    •   Maseno IR Home
    • Journal Articles
    • School of Medicine
    • Department of Pathology
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Evaluation of the Parasight Platform for Malaria Diagnosis

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Journal of Clinical Microbiology-2017-Eshel-768.full.pdf (1.084Mb)
    Publication Date
    2017-03
    Author
    Yochay Eshel, a Arnon Houri-Yafin,a Hagai Benkuzari,a Natalie Lezmy,a Mamta Soni,b Malini Charles,b Jayanthi Swaminathan,c Hilda Solomon,c Pavithra Sampathkumar,b Zul Premji,d Caroline Mbithi,d Zaitun Nneka,d Simon Onsongo,d Daniel Maina,d Sarah Levy-Schreier,a Caitlin Lee Cohen,a Dan Gluck,a Joseph Joel Pollak,a Seth J. Salpetera
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract/Overview
    ABSTRACT The World Health Organization estimates that nearly 500 million malaria tests are performed annually. While microscopy and rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are the main diagnostic approaches, no single method is inexpensive, rapid, and highly accurate. Two recent studies from our group have demonstrated a prototype computer vision platform that meets those needs. Here we present the results from two clinical studies on the commercially available version of this technology, the Sight Diagnostics Parasight platform, which provides malaria diagnosis, species identification, and parasite quantification. We conducted a multisite trial in Chennai, India (Apollo Hospital [n 205]), and Nairobi, Kenya (Aga Khan University Hospital [n 263]), in which we compared the device to microscopy, RDTs, and PCR. For identification of malaria, the device performed similarly well in both contexts (sensitivity of 99% and specificity of 100% at the Indian site and sensitivity of 99.3% and specificity of 98.9% at the Kenyan site, compared to PCR). For species identification, the device correctly identified 100% of samples with Plasmodium vivax and 100% of samples with Plasmodium falciparum in India and 100% of samples with P. vivax and 96.1% of samples with P. falciparum in Kenya, compared to PCR. Lastly, comparisons of the device parasite counts with those of trained microscopists produced average Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.84 at the Indian site and 0.85 at the Kenyan sit
    Permalink
    https://repository.maseno.ac.ke/handle/123456789/3022
    Collections
    • Department of Pathology [17]

    Maseno University. All rights reserved | Copyright © 2022 
    Contact Us | Send Feedback

     

     

    Browse

    All of Maseno IRCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Maseno University. All rights reserved | Copyright © 2022 
    Contact Us | Send Feedback