• Login
    • Login
    Advanced Search
    View Item 
    •   Maseno IR Home
    • Journal Articles
    • School of Agriculture and Food Security
    • Department of Agricultural Economics & Development
    • View Item
    •   Maseno IR Home
    • Journal Articles
    • School of Agriculture and Food Security
    • Department of Agricultural Economics & Development
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Supply chain performance and satisfaction: investigating the perceptions of relationship quality in the Ugandan maize supply chain

    Thumbnail
    Publication Date
    2017
    Author
    Walter Odongo
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract/Overview
    This PhD research assessed the perception of supply chain relationship quality and how it influences supply chain performance and satisfaction. The study was conducted in a triadic agribusiness (maize) supply chain in Uganda. Maize is an important economic crop due to the fact that Uganda has a competitive advantage in the production segment of the maize supply chain. These strategic advantages means that improvements in maize marketing systems have the potential to increase household income and hence contribute to poverty reduction for the predominantly smallholder maize farmers. To succeed and remain competitive, maize supply chain members needs to improve on their collaborative behaviours through establishing and maintaining long-term relationships. Using a triad as a unit of theory and analysis, primary data was collected from 150 maize supply chain members i.e. supplier, focal firms, customers. We find that good relationship quality was perceived to positively influence performance. Improvements in supply chain performance was positively associated with economic satisfaction, but not with social satisfaction. Further, we found that relationship duration and firm size did not influence the perceptions performance and satisfaction. On power relations, use of coercive power was perceived to negatively influence performance, while the use of non-coercive power was perceived to positively influence performance. In each of the examined relationships, supply chain members differed in their perceptions of relationship quality. The observed differences in perceptions revealed the different mechanisms through which the supply chain manages its downstream and upstream segments. While the formal downstream was managed based on contracts and trust, the informal upstream was managed based on power-dependency and trust relationships. Basing on transaction cost economics, the balance theory and the structural-hole concept, this study illustrates how a supply chain is capable of managing its formal and informal segments to ensure success of the entire supply chain. We conclude that engaging in good supply chain relationships has potentials to improve the performance of individual supply chain members, as well as the performance of the entire supply chain. However, for it to succeed, these relationships have to be tailor-made to fit the respective supply chain partners’ perspectives, interests and characteristics.
    Permalink
    https://repository.maseno.ac.ke/handle/123456789/2669
    Collections
    • Department of Agricultural Economics & Development [134]

    Maseno University. All rights reserved | Copyright © 2022 
    Contact Us | Send Feedback

     

     

    Browse

    All of Maseno IRCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Maseno University. All rights reserved | Copyright © 2022 
    Contact Us | Send Feedback