Influence Buffer Zone Regimes Area on the Protected Tree Species Richness and Density in Kakamega Forest, Kakamega County, Kenya
View/ Open
Publication Date
2020-02Author
amasaka Joan Mukhwana, Boniface Oluoch Oindo, Ben Akalla Musonye
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract/ Overview
Buffer zone regimes (BZRs) enhance protection of forests in the world. For
instance, they influence protection of about 50% in Latin America 30% in Sub-Saharan
Africa and 63% in temperate countries. In Kenya, Nyayo Tea Zone (NTZ) was
established as a BZR around all gazetted forests in early 1980’s. In areas where soils
were not ideal for tea, Exotic Tree Plantations (ETP) was established. In spite of BZR in
Kakamega forest, some section of BZR remains Open Edge (OE) probably because TEA
and ETP did not thrive or as a result of poor management. In the past the trees that were
abundant in Kakamega forest currently, remained threatened and some species rare
possibly due to exploitation. However, studies on the influence of BZR (OE, ETP, and
NTZ) area on tree species richness remain unknown in Kakamega forest. Therefore, the
objective of this study is to examine the influence of BZRs area on tree species richness.
Study population was unknown. Cross- sectional descriptive research design was
employed. Saturated sampling was used to sample at least 40 humanly accessible along a
string placed 100m from forest edge area interior gradient as it was assumed to be most
disturbed area. OE acted as a control site assuming all the forest conditions were similar.
A tape measure was adjusted along the string for identified plots. Study sites were
located using hand held GPS. Trees were identified visually and counted. There was
assumption of sources of errors for failure to come up with regular squares. Simple linear
regression was used to assess the influence of BZRs (OE, ETP, and NTZ) area and the
protected tree species richness. Results showed that NTZ 93% (r
2
=0.93, p = 0.000), ETP
82% (r
2
=0.82, p = 0.000) as compared to those in OE 68 % (r2 = 0.68, p = 0.000). The
results implied that both NTZ and ETP were better supporting protection of the higher
number of tree species richness as compared to OE.The study concluded that BZRs (OE,
ETP and NTZ) area influenced tree species richness as opposed to OE. The study
recommends the investigation onto the impact of NTZ and ETP on the health of trees in
order to compare the health condition of the forest or its deterioration.