| dc.contributor.author | Korir, Daniel | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ndung’u, W Phyllis | |
| dc.contributor.author | Onyango, Alice | |
| dc.contributor.author | Arndt, Claudia | |
| dc.contributor.author | Goopy, John | |
| dc.contributor.author | Marquardt, Svenja | |
| dc.contributor.author | Eckard, Richard | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-11-07T09:07:11Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-11-07T09:07:11Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2023-07-10 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.maseno.ac.ke/handle/123456789/6195 | |
| dc.description | https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3148140/v1 | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Highlights• Use of Tier 2 resulted in 19-25% lower total GHG emissions compared to Tier 1.• Using locally measured methane yield instead of the defaults resulted in 19-25% lower GHG emission estimates.• Energy allocation method results in lower milk EI compared to using protein output. | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Research square | en_US |
| dc.subject | sub-Saharan Africa, emission factors, emission intensity, Milk, live weight gain, life cycle assessment | en_US |
| dc.title | IPCC Tier 1 methodology overestimates the carbon footprint of smallholder cattle production systems in Kenya | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
