Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEmily M Teshome, Pauline EA Andang’o, Victor Osoti, Sofie R Terwel, Walter Otieno, Ayşe Y Demir, Andrew M Prentice, Hans Verhoef
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-14T07:47:22Z
dc.date.available2020-08-14T07:47:22Z
dc.date.issued2017-12-01
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.maseno.ac.ke/handle/123456789/2113
dc.description.abstractBackground We aimed to show the non-inferiority of home fortification with a daily dose of 3 mg iron in the form of iron as ferric sodium ethylenediaminetetraacetate (NaFeEDTA) compared with 12.5 mg iron as encapsulated ferrous fumarate in Kenyan children aged 12–36 months. In addition, we updated a recent meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of home fortification with iron-containing powders, with a view to examining diversity in trial results. Methods We gave chemoprevention by dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine, albendazole and praziquantel to 338 afebrile children with haemoglobin concentration ≥70 g/L. We randomly allocated them to daily home fortification for 30 days with either placebo, 3 mg iron as NaFeEDTA or 12.5 mg iron as encapsulated ferrous fumarate. We assessed haemoglobin concentration (primary outcome), plasma iron …en_US
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_US
dc.subjectAnaemia, Child, Pre-school, Ferric sodium EDTA, Home fortification, Iron, Non-inferiority, Meta-analysisen_US
dc.titleDaily home fortification with iron as ferrous fumarate versus NaFeEDTA: a randomised, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority trial in Kenyan childrenen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record