dc.contributor.author | Omulele Salome Sungu, Aila Fredrick | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-09T16:48:37Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-03-09T16:48:37Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2321–8916 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.maseno.ac.ke/handle/123456789/5643 | |
dc.description | DOI No.: 10.24940/theijbm/2022/v10/i8/BM2208-025 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | In 2018, the World Bank reported poor performance among counties in Kenya, citing low absorption rates and
sluggish project delivery. This has been attributed to insufficient and late disbursement of funding, but the role of
change resistance management has not been examined. The approaches to change resistance management have been
addressed by scholars. However, there is limited evidence that county governments utilise these techniques. This
paper explored the extent to which Kenya's 47 county governments utilise change resistance management
techniques. Using the Social Action Theory as a foundation and a qualitative research design, a systematic assessment
of 31 studies undertaken in Kenya's public sector, including 14 on county governments since 2011, was conducted.
Thematic analysis of data gathered using a review guide reveals that county governments in Kenya employ
agreement and negotiation, coercion, co-optation and manipulation, education and communication, assistance and
facilitation, and involvement and participation. The recommendation is for county governments in Kenya to become
more actively involved in managing change resistance and to conduct additional research on county governments to
strengthen evidence and clarity | en_US |
dc.publisher | sfimar research review | en_US |
dc.subject | Change resistance management, coercion, agreement and negotiation, support and facilitation, participation and involvement, co-optation and manipulation, education and communication | en_US |
dc.title | Approaches to Change Resistance Management among County Governments in Kenya | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |