Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKasomo Daniel
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-04T08:11:35Z
dc.date.available2020-09-04T08:11:35Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citation3en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.maseno.ac.ke/handle/123456789/2712
dc.description.abstractIn this article we have begun by defining ethnocentrism. According to anthropologists, the concept combines the belief that one’s own culture is superior to other cultures, with the practice of judging other cultures by the standards of one’s own culture. Sociologists and social-psychologists extend the term to group attitudes shown by religious, economic, racial, caste and class group within a larger social order. Ethnocentrism is also defined as a feeling that one’s own group has a mode of living, values and patterns of adaptation that are superior to other groups. This leads to a generalised contempt of members of other groups. In conclusion the paper has pointed out that in its extreme form, ethnocentrism may lead to violent cultural conflicts and ethnic cleansing. This is followed by possible solutions to challenges raised in the paper.en_US
dc.publisherInternational Journal of Applied Sociologyen_US
dc.subjectCleansing, Ethnology, Ethnicity, Ethnocentricism, Genocideen_US
dc.titleHistorical Manifestation of Ethnocentrism and its challenges Todayen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record